home | index | units | counting | geometry | algebra | trigonometry & functions | calculus
analysis | sets & logic | number theory | recreational | misc | nomenclature & history | physics

Final Answers
© 2000-2023   Gérard P. Michon, Ph.D.

Photons
Quanta of Electromagnetic Radiation

Let there be light !
Genesis 1:3
 Michon
 

Related articles on this site:

Related Links (Outside this Site)

Efficiency of nanoscale confinement in solar cells by Shanhui Fan et al.

Wikipedia :   Photon   |   Photonics   |   Nanophotonics

 
Videos:  What is a photonWhere do photons come from?  by  Steve Johnson.
How do we see light(Nobel 2012; Serge Haroche, David Wineland)  in  MinutePhysics.
Lumière et matière (1:53:35)  by  Jean Dalibard  (Espace des siences, 2015-04-07).
 
border
border
 International Year of Light 2015
International
Year of Light
and
Light-Based Technologies
 International Year of Light

Photonics


tk3078  (Yahoo!  2010-12-29)   Studying the quanta of light.
What's the difference between  photonics  and optics?

Optics  deal with light in a classical way  (i.e, without quantum concepts)  using one of two viewpoints:

  • Geometrical optics  is based on the concept of  light rays  propagating in a straight line according to the classical laws of reflection  (angle of reflexion = angle of incidence)  and refraction  (Snell's law).  Both of these where unified as consequences of the  principle of least time  postulated by Pierre de Fermat iaround 1635 and confirmed experimentally in 1851  (when it was finally established that the celerity of light is indeed inversely proportional to the index of refraction of the medium).
     
  • The  wave theory of light,  on the other hand, explains diffraction  (as well as the laws of reflexion and refraction of geometrical optics, incidentally).  It was first championned by Christiaan Huygens and received experimental support from Thomas Young in 1803.  The idea that light is a form of electromagnetic wave is due to Michael Faraday, who was later vindicated mathematically by James Clerk Maxwell  (Maxwell's equations, 1864).

By contrast,  quantum optics  (fundamental research)  and  photonics  (applied science)  are based on the explicit idea that light consists of packets of energy proportional to its frequency  (the coefficient of proportionality being  Planck's constant).  This idea was formally put forth in 1905 by Albert Einstein to explain the photoelectric effect  (in 1900, Max Planck had paved the way by showing that the blackbody spectrum could be explained by postulating that  all energy exchanges  between radiation and matter could only occur in  quanta  of energy proportional to the frequency).

So, the key difference between optics and photonics is that the latter deals primarily with the  quantization of light  which is ignored by the former.

Also, in optics we consider light to consist  either  of particles  (explaining the  light rays  and  sharp shadows  on which geometrical optics is based)  or  waves  (which explain diffraction using Huygens principle).  In  photonics,  we integrate the quantum notion that the light quanta  (photons)  have properties characteristic of  both  waves and particles.

Wikipedia :   Photonics vs. Geometrical optics.

 Heinrich Hertz 
 (1743-1794)
(2011-01-03)   The Photoelectric Effect   (Einstein, 1905)
What is the  work function  of a metal?

The photoelectric effect was first observed in 1887, by  Heinrich Hertz (1857-1894).  He found that an illuminated metallic surface produced an electric current proportional to the intensity of the light  (as could be reasonably expected)  but only if the light frequency exceeded a certain  threshold  which depended on the metallic surface involved.  That  was a surprise begging for an explanation which  Einstein  would only provide in 1905  (he was awarded the 1921 Nobel prize  mostly  for that reason).

When the surface is  highly polished  the experimental value of the aforementioned threshold depends on the metal involved and its crystalline structure.  Einstein conjectured that every electron was bound to the metallic structure by some binding energy  W,  dubbed  work function.

Einstein further assumed that energy was carried by light carried in disrete packets  proportional  to the frequency  n  (for which Lewis coined the word  photon,  in 1926).  Using the constant of proportionality  h  introduced by  Planck  in 1900.  the kinetic energy of each released electron would then be:

½ m v2   =   h n  -  W

That conjecture was verified experimentally in 1915 by  Robert A. Millikan (1868-1953; Nobel 1923)  who gave  h  to about  1%  in the process...

Wikipedia :   Photoelectric effect   |   Work function
 
The photoelectric effect (22:54)  by  Barton Zwiebach  (MIT 8.04, L3.1, Spring 2016).


(2015-05-08)   Minimal signal-to-noise ratio of a light sensor :
The ultimate limit depends only on the  number  of photons received.

This imposes a lower limit on the noise of the image sensors used on modern digital cameras.  Those are composed of a digital array consisting of millions of individual sensors of the type analyzed below:  One per pixel for a black-and-white sensor, up to four per pixel for color photography.

The arrival of photons in a monochromatic light beam is essentially a  Poisson process  whose  activity  a  is equal to the  radiant power  of the beam  (in watts, W)  divided into the energy of each photon  (in joules, J).

For  standard  yellow-green light  (540 THz)  the luminous power in lumens  (lm)  is, by definition, 683 times the  radiant power  in watts (W). A surface area of  S  square meters receiving an illumination of  L  (expressed in lx, a  lux  being defined as a lumen per square meter)  thus receives an average number of photons per second equal to the activity in becquerels  (Bq)  of the aforementioned  Poisson process,  namely:

a   =   S (L / 683) / (h  5.4 1014 Hz)   =   L S  4.092 1015

If we express  a  in  Bq,   L  in  lx  and  S  in square microns,  we have: 

a   =   4092  L S

In a Poisson process with an activity of  a becquerels, the probability of observing exactly n arrivals in t seconds is given by:

Pn  =  exp(-lt) (at) n / n!

The  average  number of arrivals is  at.  Let  N  be the RMS of the noise:

N 2  +  (at) 2   =    S n   Pn  n 2

For the right-hand-side summation, we use the following remarks:

S n   x n / n!   =   exp (x)
S n   n  x n / n!   =   x d/dx exp (x)   =   x  exp (x)
S n n 2  x n / n!   =   x d/dx [ x exp (x) ]   =   x  exp (x)  +  x exp(x)

Applying this to the above with  x = at   yields:  N2 + (at) 2  =  (at) + (at) 2
So, the RMS value of the noise is  N = Ö(at).  and the signal to noise ratio is:

SNR   =   at / N   =   (at)½

 Come back later, we're
 still working on this one...

Wikipedia :   Image noise   |   Shot noise


(2020-04-07)   Dual Noise   (Einstein. 1909)
Shot noise of photons is added to the  speckle  of lightwaves.

Gibbs (1902)  and  Einstein (1904)  independently found the following expression for the mean-square energy fluctuations per unit of a constant volume  V  in thermal equilibrium with a bath at temperature T:

< e2 >   =   k T2   (   <E>
Vinculum
T
 ) 
V 

For  blackbody radiation,  the mean energy density  [energy per unit volume]  of the photons whose frequencies are between n and n+dn is given by Planck's radiation formula :

 
<E>   =   un dn   =   
 
8p hn3 dn
vinculum
c3 ( exp( hn / kT ) - 1 )
  (Max Planck,  1900-12-14)
 

Introducing the spectral density of photons  r  we have  r hn  =  un .

 Come back later, we're
 still working on this one...

Therefore,   < e2 >   =   (  hn r  +    c 3
Vinculum
8p n2
 r2  )   dn

Einstein noticed that the first term of that bracket corresponds to the  shot noise  discussed in the  previous section,  which would be the sole noise observed if light was purely corpuscular,  while the second can be attributed to the wavelike nature  also  possessed by Plankian light radiation.  He interpreted that as a direct clue to the  dual nature  of light.  Both a wave and a flow of particles...

On the present status of the radiation problem  A. Einstein, Phys. Z. 10, 185-193 (1909).
 
On the development of our views concerning the nature and constitution of radiation
by  Albert EinsteinPhysikalische Zeitschrift, 10, 817-826 (1909).
 
Reappraising Einstein's 1909 application of fluctuation theory to Planckian radiation
by  F.E. Irons  American Journal of Physics, 72, 8, 1059-1067  (August 2004).


(2015-08-23)   Counting photons without destroying them:
The work for which  Serge Haroche  was awarded a Nobel Prize (2012).

All ordinary light sensors are  receptors  of photons, which is to say that they absorb every photon they detect, thereby destroying it.

What Haroche discovered at the

 Come back later, we're
 still working on this one...

Serge Haroche (b. 1944)


(2019-02-15)   Quantum Optics
Describing quantum states of light without classical analogs.

The semi-classical model of interactions between light and matter is fairly adequate to descrive the  photoelectric effect  and the  stimulated emission of radiation  on which  lasers  are based,  but it can't explain  spontaneous emission  or purely quantum effects like:

  • Single photon.
  • Entangled pairs of photons.
  • Squeezed light  (quantum metrology used in  LiGO).

Canonical Quantization of Single-Mode Free Radiation :

 Come back later, we're
 still working on this one...

56 videos  by  Alain Aspect  and  Michel Brune  (2017).
One-photon interference experiment (14:21)  by  Alain Aspect  (2017-11-07).


(2023-07-20)   Soft Photons
With (almost) no energy., they still carry one whole unit of spin.

 Come back later, we're
 still working on this one...

Soft particles  by  Andy Strominger  (Lex Fridman  2023-02-15).

border
border
visits since January 3, 2011
 (c) Copyright 2000-2023, Gerard P. Michon, Ph.D.